We used to talk about grit like it was baked into the game, into life. You earned it through sweat, setbacks, and showing up when nobody else wanted to. Why does it feel like grit, the old-school, get-back-up-and-keep-pushing kind, is slowly disappearing?

We’re not imagining it. It’s happening. It’s not just slipping, it’s shrinking, and fast.

Society and the Eroding Grit

We dug into the numbers, and they’re pretty telling. As tech innovation has surged, our “work ethic” has dipped. As a society, we’re working less, scrolling more, and letting screens do the heavy lifting. The rise of convenience has quietly replaced the grind.  To quantify this, let’s consider the following:

Since the 1950s, this score has been declining steadily. After 2000? It tanks. More screens, more comfort, fewer challenges. And here’s the kicker, As our Grit Score drops, anxiety rises. 

Tech Made Life Easier — But Are We Getting Softer?

We’re not here to bash innovation. Tech has made life more efficient, no doubt. Tasks that once took hours now take seconds. But the real question is: what are we doing with all that extra time? Are we using it to build, create, and push ourselves further, or just to scroll, consume, and coast?

Too often, we choose comfort over challenge. We binge instead of build. And as parents/adults, we’re not immune. In the midst of it all, we somehow convince ourselves that a full schedule is a gritty schedule, that structure equals strength. So we load up our kids with before-school skill sessions to make the travel teams, and add enrichment programs and tutors to help them excel (or just keep up) academically.

Our kids are busy, sure. But are they becoming gritty? Or just really good at following instructions?

Grit Can’t Be Scheduled

You can’t synthesize or replicate grit in a lab. Grit is raw,  and it can show up in anything. It’s the time they choose to work, not because they have to, but because they’re passionate, curious, and hungry to push limits and expand their own horizons.

The Edge We’re Missing

Here’s the irony: in a world built to make everything easier, grit has quietly become a rare competitive edge. The ability to delay gratification, to lean into boredom, to keep pursuing something long before the payoff, that’s no longer the norm. That’s the exception, but the truth is, we struggle with this as adults, too. 

And maybe that’s the problem. We’ve engineered convenience so well that struggle now feels optional, even avoidable. But resilience doesn’t come from ease. It comes from the hard reps, the off days, the quiet moments when no one’s watching, and you still show up.

As a society, we have to be cognizant of this decline in grit. More importantly, we have to be disciplined enough to reverse it, to earn grit daily by moving our bodies, challenging our minds, and engaging our imaginations. Grit isn’t just a personal trait; it’s a cultural muscle, and we all have a role in strengthening it.

Because grit can’t be outsourced.
It has to be modeled.
It has to be lived.

That’s the edge.
That’s Grit Kore.

Find. A. Way.

Greg

The post The Ever‑Shrinking Grit Score first appeared on Grit Kore.

If there’s one thing youth hockey teaches us (besides exactly how early your closest coffee shop opens on Sunday morning), it’s that not all ice sheets are created equal. Last weekend we fired up our Grit Kore methodology, dove headfirst into six youth games, and came out with data, sweat, and a few raised eyebrows. Turns out, how big the rink is might just change who actually gets to touch the puck. So refill that coffee mug, it’s about to get stat-nerdy and parent-relatable.  

Setting the Stage: What We Measured

• We tracked two PW Major elite teams and two high-level Mite Major teams, playing on full ice sheets, with the former playing two games on an Olympic-sized rink.
• All data collection was done off the bench, no in-game distractions, just pure observation (from the stands / LiveBarn).
• We computed Grit Scores per player, then analyzed the distributions (average, spread, etc.).

Here’s what jumped out:

• The full-ice Mite team actually had a higher average Grit Score than the elite squad.
• But, here’s the kicker, the spread (std dev) in the full-ice Mite game was more than double that of the elite team.
• The half-ice Mite team’s spread was much tighter, closer to the elite team’s dispersion.

Interpretation: Why the Spread (Standard Deviation) Matters

If you’re revisiting your stats class, standard deviation (SD) tells us how spread out the scores are around the mean. A high Standard Deviation means “some players dominate, some barely register.” A low SD suggests more equitable contributions across the roster. So what does our data imply?

1. Full-ice Mite = wide spread A few energetic kids got tons of touches (and grit), while others received less. The distribution is skewed: some players shine, many fade.
2. Half‑ice = more egalitarian The constraints of less space force more consistent participation. More kids get involved, more regularly.
3. Elite level = tighter dispersion At higher levels, the playing field levels itself out. Better training, more trust, and more even playing time may shrink variance,  players “earn their grit” more uniformly.

That’s exactly why the standard deviation for full-ice Mite Major is over DOUBLE that of the elite team.  

Why This Matters to You (the Parent / Coach / Fan)

• Playing time & development Young kids thrive when they feel valuable. In a full-ice setting, weaker or less aggressive players may get buried under variance. A half-ice structure ensures more balanced opportunity for touches, builds confidence, and fosters development.
• Motivation & grit culture If the goal is “earn 10–15% more grit daily,” you want each player to sense that daily struggle matters. Tightening variance helps more kids believe they can improve.
• Variety is key While full ice gives the authentic experience (locker rooms, officiating structure, emulation of pro hockey), sprinkling in half-ice games or practice drills can help reduce dispersion and let the “quiet contributors” grow.

Hypothesis for the Future

As kids mature and gain more experience, I’d bet that standard deviation shrinks further (adjusted for playing time). In other words, by the time they’re in Bantam or Midget, more players are contributing similarly, and the variance gap between full-ice and scaled-down games narrows.  

Coaching Takeaways (For Teams, Coaches & Parents)

• Track Grit Scores (or any touch metric) regularly to spot persistent “silent zones” — players who rarely get a touch.
• Celebrating small contributions — reinforcing “every touch counts” helps those on the lower end of the curve.

Final Word: Find. A. Way.

At Grit Kore, our mission is to help kids see themselves on the ice, feel their growth, and earn that extra grit every day. Ice size is more than just a logistics decision, it changes the shape of who plays. Let’s mix it up,  full ice, half ice, small area, and give every kid a chance to lean in, push harder, and find their way.

FIND. A. WAY.

Greg

The post The Standard Deviation Shift: How Ice Size Changes Who Touches the Puck first appeared on Grit Kore.