We’ve all been there.

A tournament 45 minutes outside a third-tier city.
Three-star hotel.
Rink. Lobby. Repeat.
Vacation days disappearing faster than expected.

The parent playdate goes a little too long.
The next morning…the idea of the gym, reading, or anything beyond breathing and blinking feels like a stretch.

A gritless weekend.

And on its own, that’s fine.

But when weekends like this stack up, something subtle happens:

You don’t fall apart…
You just start to drift.

We’ve talked before about how earning grit daily reduces anxiety.

Not because it’s intense—but because it keeps you aligned with yourself.

The challenge is that most of us are years removed from school—the last time structure did that work for us.

Back then:

• practice
• tests
• routines
• expectations

You were guided into growth.

Then that structure disappears.

And you enter a new node.

More freedom.
Fewer constraints.
More choices.

And that’s where the path starts to separate.

Think about it this way:

Your life moves through nodes—new environments, new phases.

Within each node:

• each day is a smaller node
• each decision, a smaller one still

And quietly, those decisions compound.

There’s also something else happening:

You have an idea of who you could be in that environment.
A projected path.

When your daily actions don’t match that path, a gap forms.

The identity gap.

You might not notice it right away.
But you’ll feel it.

As friction.
As low-level anxiety.
As a sense that you’re slightly off.

And here’s the part that matters:

You don’t close that gap all at once.

You close it inside the day.

Tournament weekends are a perfect example.

They’re a new node:

• different environment
• less structure
• more opportunities to drift

So the question isn’t:
“Do I overhaul everything?”

It’s simpler than that.

Can you live inside the node—just a little differently?

• 10 minutes on the treadmill
• a few pages of a book
• a moment to think instead of scroll

Not perfect.
Just intentional.

Because your kids are trying to build something on the ice.

And whether you realize it or not—you are too.

Small decisions.
Repeated.
That’s the path.

Find. A. Way.

Greg

The post The Path of Identity first appeared on Grit Kore.

We’ve all heard it:

“Kids these days aren’t built like we were.”

And honestly… that’s true.

But not for the reason people think.

It’s not that kids are softer.

It’s that they’re growing up in a completely different environment—one we weren’t built for either.

How We Got Here

Go back 150 years.

Your world was small.

• You were the farmer’s kid

• The blacksmith’s kid

• The best (or worst) at something… within a 10-mile radius

And that was enough.

Your identity was:

• local

• stable

• rarely challenged

You didn’t wake up wondering how you compared to the top 1% of humanity.

Then came radio.

Suddenly, you became aware:

“Oh… there are other ways to live.”

But still—your actual competition stayed local.

Then TV showed up.

Now you didn’t just hear about other people—you saw them.

• better athletes

• better looking people

• better lives

Comparison started creeping in.

Then came the internet.

Then social media.

And now?

A 12-year-old kid can compare themselves to:

• the best athlete

• the funniest creator

• the most attractive person

• the richest lifestyle

…all before lunch.

The New Reality

Kids today don’t grow up thinking:

“I might be the best.”

They grow up knowing:

“There are thousands of people better than me.”

Even if that’s just a snapshot in time.

That changes things.

Because it introduces pressure before identity is fully formed.

Social Media and Mental Distress

Now layer this on top:

• constant exposure

• constant comparison

• constant feedback

It’s like getting performance reviews… all day… for your entire life.

Even for things you don’t care about.

That’s exhausting.

What the data shows

Across countries like the U.S., Sweden, and Finland, we see:

• social media use increasing

• mental distress increasing alongside it

Not perfectly.

Not causation.

But directionally—especially in the U.S.—it’s hard to ignore.

The Identity Formula (Simplified)

Here’s the idea in plain English:

Identity grows when kids do real things, consistently, even when it’s hard.

And it slows—or even reverses—when:

• they’re doing things just to be seen

• they don’t actually care about what they’re doing

• they start believing they’re “not good enough”

• they avoid discomfort

If you want the formula:

Identity Growth = (Capability × Real Effort × Tolerance for Discomfort^2)

– (Performing for others + Negative self-perception × Avoidance)

Yeah… it looks like math.

But it’s actually pretty simple:

Do real things + stick with them = growth

Fake it + avoid hard things = drift (or worse)

Where It Goes Wrong

Here’s the subtle trap.

Kids are actually pretty good at just… doing things.

• playing

• trying

• improving

They don’t naturally sit around thinking about their “personal brand.”

But then adults step in.

• “Look at this kid”

• “This is what elite looks like”

• “You need to be here”

Now the activity shifts from:

play → performance

And from:

engagement → signaling

That’s when identity starts to wobble.

Why This Matters

Because over time:

• real engagement builds identity

• performative engagement erodes it

And if perception becomes the main driver?

Kids stop doing things to improve…

and start doing things to be seen.

This Is Where Grit Comes In

Grit isn’t just toughness.

It’s the ability to stay engaged in something real—

even when it’s hard,

even when you’re not the best,

even when the world is telling you to stop.

In today’s environment, grit is what keeps kids building on the left side of the equation—when everything around them is pulling them to the right.

In a world of constant comparison, grit is what keeps a child moving forward anyway.

The Hard Truth

We can’t remove the world they’re growing up in.

They will see:

• better players

• better students

• better everything

But that’s not the real problem.

The problem is:

how much weight we put on that comparison

What Actually Helps

If you look back at the formula, the answer is pretty simple:

Focus on the left side.

• real effort

• consistency

• discomfort

And reduce the weight of:

• perception

• constant evaluation

Simple Reframe

Instead of:

“How do I compare?”

Shift to:

“Did I actually show up today?”

Why This Matters for Mental Health

If you look at the formula, mental distress isn’t random.

It lives on the right side:

• comparing

• signaling

• worrying about how you’re perceived

The more time a child spends there, the more distress builds.

But here’s the important part:

Time spent on the left side crowds out the right.

When kids are:

• engaged

• working at something real

• pushing through difficulty

They’re not stuck thinking about themselves.

They’re just… doing.

Simple way to think about it

You don’t think your way out of mental distress.

You engage your way out of it.

For Parents

For parents, the job is simple—but not easy:

Help your kids fall in love with the left side of the formula.

Because that’s where identity is built.

And it’s also where mental distress starts to fade.

Everything else is noise.

Find. A. Way.

Greg

The post Why Grit Matters first appeared on Grit Kore.

This week felt like a live experiment.

Daryl Jones — a.k.a. Jonesy, a.k.a. the real most interesting man in the world, a.k.a. The Gold Coast’s Most Eligible Bachelor (office hours: M–F 8pm–12am, Sa–Su 9pm) — announced he had “acquired” two major youth hockey organizations.

The language alone — straight out of Harvard Business School — should have been the giveaway.

It wasn’t.

It was congratulated.

It was criticized.

It was shared.

It was believed.

On April Fool’s.

Nearly ⅓ of the youth hockey registration in the northeast had seen the post in less than 24 hours.

That got us thinking:

Do people under pressure accept information faster?

Research suggests yes.

Which leads to a bigger question:

Are we living in a time of elevated anxiety?

Not the sharp, obvious kind — but something quieter.

Ambient anxiety: a persistent, low-level unease that isn’t tied to a specific threat, but subtly shapes how we perceive and respond to the world.

The Grit Kore Anxiety Index

To explore this, we combined market volatility (VIX) with Google search behavior to build the Grit Kore Anxiety Index

What we see:

• A noticeable rise beginning around 2015
• A step-change post-2020
• A new baseline of elevated ambient anxiety

Why this matters

A friend — whose father and brother both played in the NHL — shared something interesting.

Growing up, his mom constantly tracked what other prospects were doing.

Now that their careers are over… she follows politics with the same intensity.

The outlet changed.

The behavior didn’t.

So I asked him:

“Was that awareness helpful?”

His answer:

“No. If anything, it probably made things worse.”

The takeaway

Anxiety doesn’t just exist — it moves.

From hockey… to school… to careers… to politics.

And if we’re not aware of it, it starts to shape:

• how we think
• how we react
• how we parent

The challenge

As parents, coaches, and leaders, we need to recognize:

1. Ambient anxiety is real
2. It influences behavior more than we think
3. We have a choice in how we respond to it

Take time to:

• move your body
• slow your mind
• create space

Because if we don’t…

this ambient anxiety doesn’t just affect us — it transfers to our kids.

Find. A. Way.

Greg

Related: Hockey Tryouts and Your Kid’s Identity — tryout season is when anxiety peaks most. Also read: How to Build Confidence in Youth Hockey. Browse more on the Hockey Parents Resource Guide.

See all resources: Hockey Parents Resource Guide

The post Grit Kore Anxiety Index first appeared on Grit Kore.

A few years ago, that word was grit.

It fit the game perfectly. Hockey is a little grimy. A little chaotic. It rewards the player who keeps going when things aren’t clean.

But when we tried to define grit, it got surprisingly hard.

The more we talked about it, the more vague it became.

Around that same time, we were working on a series of children’s books with former NHL players Matt Moulson and Mike Komisarek—guys who played over a decade of pro hockey, despite taking very unlikely paths to get there.

We spent hours talking with them.

Not about systems. Not about skill.

About how they actually made it.

And a pattern kept showing up.

They all had:

• a deep passion for the game
• an unrelenting commitment to their craft
• a strong sense of accountability

But those things weren’t enough on their own.

What tied everything together was something else:

They could handle discomfort.

They could take failure, pressure, doubt, bad games, setbacks—and keep going anyway.

So we tried to simplify it.

If you think about it structurally:

Grit = DT × P × C × A

Where:

• DT = Discomfort Tolerance
• P = Passion
• C = Commitment
• A = Accountability

The key variable is DT.

Because without it, the rest don’t hold up.

You can be passionate—but quit when it gets hard.

You can be committed—but fade under pressure.

You can be accountable—but get defensive when things go wrong.

Discomfort tolerance is what allows the other traits to actually show up.

The higher it is, the deeper everything else can go.

So if that’s true, the question becomes:

How do we build it?

Not through speeches.

Not through motivation.

But through experience.

• Let kids fail—and let them respond
• Encourage them to chase something difficult
• Remove shortcuts
• Model it ourselves

I used to think we connected because of hockey.

We didn’t.

We connected because we share a higher tolerance for discomfort.

That pulls you closer to reality—

and reality is where better conversations happen.

If we want our kids to grow, we have to let them get uncomfortable.

That’s what brings them closer to reality—where they learn their strengths, their weaknesses, and who they really are.

That’s where they push themselves.

That’s where they grow.

Our job isn’t to make it easier.

It’s to stand beside them while they go through it.

Because the more we protect them from discomfort,

the more we hold them back from developing grit.

Find. A. Way.

Greg

The post Defining Grit first appeared on Grit Kore.

If anxious energy could be measured with a thermometer, Fairfield County would be in the middle of a heat wave.

It’s hockey tryout season.

The nervous chatter.

The heightened gossip.

The speculative “I heard they’re taking six forwards from the A team…”

All hallmarks of tryout uncertainty.

But here’s the question:

Why are the parents so anxious?

They’re not skating.

They’re not doing the drills.

They’re definitely not bag skating at the end of practice.

Yet every year, the anxiety levels spike like clockwork.

Trying to understand this behavior led us to a framework we jokingly call:

The Symbolic Status Dynamics Model (SSDM).

Think of it as a slightly humorous way to explain why otherwise rational adults start behaving like stock traders during an earnings call the moment tryouts begin.

Our Primitive Beginnings

A few years ago, during a deep dive on developing “alpha mentality” in players with another coach, we stumbled across the documentary Chimp Empire.

It’s a fascinating look at the hierarchical structure inside chimp tribes.

The biggest takeaway?

Above all else, the chimps want to belong to the tribe.

And two million years after Homo erectus, humans are not that different.

We still want to belong.

The SSDM

Within any group, some people simply want to belong.

Others want to belong… and stand out.

Those are the alphas.

But here’s the problem at the top of the income chain:

differentiation becomes difficult.

Nice houses? Everyone has one.

Nice cars? Plenty in the parking lot.

Nice vacations? Instagram confirms.

But children’s placement in schools, teams, and clubs?

That’s scarce.

Scarcity creates status signals.

And suddenly a youth hockey team starts to look a little bit like a social sorting machine.

When kids become the conduit to belonging to an “elite” group—whether it’s hockey, schools, or clubs—parental anxiety begins to resemble the needle on a Richter scale during a megathrust earthquake.

Every stride in tryouts is analyzed.

Every shift becomes a referendum on social standing.

Every rumor spreads like breaking news.

Which brings us to the parents.

The Parent Archetypes of SSDM

Over time we’ve noticed a few recurring parent archetypes in youth hockey ecosystems.

You’ll probably recognize at least one.

Possibly yourself.

1. Legacy Hockey Parent

Status Relationship: Identity continuity

These are the classic “hockey families.”

Mom or dad played.

The garage smells faintly of old equipment.

There may be framed team photos somewhere in the house.

For them, hockey isn’t just a sport.

It’s family culture.

They want their kids to keep playing because it preserves a piece of family identity. When the kids make teams, the lineage continues.

Strengths:

• Deep understanding of the game
• Respect for the “Code”

Risk:

• Hockey identity can become inherited rather than chosen.

2. Cultural Convert

Status Relationship: Identity adoption

Every team has one.

These are parents who didn’t grow up in hockey, but quickly become enthusiastic adopters of the culture.

They buy the gear.

They learn the slang.

They suddenly have opinions about power play formations.

Because they didn’t grow up inside the system, they often rely on others to interpret development pathways. Sometimes that leads to… ambitious development plans.

Strengths:

• High enthusiasm
• Willingness to learn

Risk:

• Vulnerable to the more extreme corners of the “development industry.”

3. Optimizer

Status Relationship: Status engineering

The Optimizer treats youth hockey like a strategic environment.

They understand the inner workings of teams and organizations.

They may help coordinate apparel, ice time, or team logistics. In return, they gain proximity to decision‑makers and elevated status within the parent ecosystem.

Their child doesn’t just belong to the team.

The family becomes part of the organizational machinery.

Strengths:

• Highly engaged
• Resourceful

Risk:

• Childhood can start to resemble project management.

4. Status Narrator

Status Relationship: Narrative protection

You’ve heard this one before.

A parent explaining an injustice.

A retelling of why a roster decision doesn’t make sense.

A carefully constructed story about how great a kid played.

Status Narrators are less focused on the game itself and more focused on protecting the narrative surrounding their child’s place in the hockey community.

Strengths:

• Passionate advocates

Risk:

• Reality occasionally bends under the weight of storytelling.

5. Process Parent

Status Relationship: Status rejection

The Process Parent is a bit old school.

They may or may not have played hockey, but they understand the Code.

Effort matters.

Sacrifice matters.

Backchecking matters.

Their emotional reaction is roughly the same whether their kid scores a goal, blocks a shot, or hustles back on defense.

The focus is simple:

Effort for the team.

Strengths:

• Stable mindset
• Long‑term development focus

Risk:

• Their kid may roll their eyes when hearing “earn your grit” for the 200th time.

Why Youth Hockey Feels Different Now

Something you often hear from former NHL players is:

“Youth hockey is so different from when we grew up.”

And they’re right.

Today’s youth hockey ecosystem includes:

• Team parties
• Parent social networks
• Bars at rinks
• Matching team apparel
• Group chats that never sleep

In other words, the parent ecosystem around the team has grown dramatically.

Parents are no longer just spectators.

They’re part of the tribe.

The Glass Around the Rink

Maybe the hockey gods knew what they were doing when they surrounded the rink with glass.

Not just to stop pucks.

But maybe to protect the kids from real‑time parental participation in the game.

Because while tryout season can feel like a high‑stakes social experiment, the truth is much simpler:

Kids just want to play hockey.

And if we’re lucky, maybe the tribe can remember that too.

Find. A. Way.

Greg

Take the survey

The post The Symbolic Status Dynamics Model (SSDM) first appeared on Grit Kore.

One of the perks of being a hockey geek who actually tracks what happens on the ice is that you get to move past opinions and look at reality. Numbers don’t lie, but they also don’t tell the whole story unless you know how to read them.

A few weeks ago, we talked about how half-ice and full-ice games both have real benefits. After reviewing our latest Grit Score data, that conclusion still holds true, but with an important twist.

Here’s what we’re seeing:

• Total Grit Scores are higher on half ice
• Energy, engagement, and excitement are higher on full ice

And in a long hockey season, both of those things matter.

What We Measured

We compared one full-ice game against the average of two half-ice games versus the same opponent. Here’s what showed up:

What This Really Means

The fundamentals, heads-up plays and forced turnovers, are almost the same on both surfaces. That tells us the kids are still competing and reading the game.

But the “grit behaviors”,  backchecks, forechecks, and blocked shots, drop way off on full ice. That’s because half ice creates more:

• puck touches
• decision-making
• close-quarter battles
• repetition

From a pure development standpoint, half ice is incredibly powerful.

But here’s the part that doesn’t show up in a spreadsheet.

The Human Factor: Energy & Engagement

We’re deep into the season now. Bodies are tired. Minds are tired. And kids want to feel like they’re playing real hockey.

When a kid stops having fun, their brain — especially the prefrontal cortex, the part responsible for focus, learning, and self-regulation — starts to shut down. You can give them all the reps in the world, but if they’re not emotionally engaged, those reps don’t stick.

That’s what we’re seeing on half ice right now. The kids are going through the motions.

Full ice changes that.

It feels new.

It feels bigger.

It feels like “the Show.”

And suddenly kids are:

• thinking about their shifts
• replaying moments in their head
• caring about positioning
• wanting to improve

That mental activation is just as important as physical reps.

So What’s the Takeaway?

This data doesn’t say half ice is wrong.

It says timing matters.

Early in the season, half ice is gold for skill development.

As the season wears on, kids need a spark — and full ice gives them that.

If anything, this supports a simple, kid-centered approach:

Start small. Build skill. Then expand the game as their minds and motivation need a lift.

That’s how you keep kids growing, engaged, and loving the game — which is what motivates them to earn grit daily.

Find. A. Way.

Greg

Grit Kore Hocky Skills and Hockey IQ books click here

The post Revisiting Grit Scores: Full Ice vs. Half Ice first appeared on Grit Kore.

A few years ago, I was out for a skate and found myself watching a Junior kid and thinking, “man, this guy is so dumb out there.” The words slipped out before I even realized what I was saying.

Then it hit me—I coach in the same area this kid grew up in. Whether I had him directly or not, I’m part of the system that shaped him. So if his hockey IQ is low, it’s not just his failure. It’s partly mine. Partly ours. That realization kicked off a rabbit hole that I’m still working through.

What is hockey IQ?

I started asking around. Friends of mine who got paid to play or coach the game gave me their take on the concept. The answers were insightful—each one touching on a different piece of the puzzle. But they didn’t quite snap together into something you could hand to a player or a parent and say, this is it. It was like trying to unify quantum mechanics with general relativity—lots of truths, no single theory.

None of the replies seemingly unified the concepts:

Mike Komisarek (11 seasons in the NHL, Defense, Wolverines, Player Development Coach-Vancouver Canucks, hockey dad) put it like this:

“Elite hockey IQ isn’t flashy plays, it’s obsessive execution of the simple, repeatable, unglamorous decisions that never hit the highlight reel. It’s cataloging the wins, owning the mistakes (chewing on them just long enough to learn, then letting them go), and immediately caring more about the next right play than the last screw-up or the scoresheet. It’s supporting the teammate who just got burned, because NHLers make tons of mistakes every night—and the best ones turn them into fuel, not anchors. Process pride. Relentless detail. Total commitment on every shift. That’s the common thread. That’s the standard.”

Max Pacioretty (17 seasons in the NHL, LW, Wolverines, coach/hockey dad) identified differences in payout/non-payout scenarios:

“Kids are obsessed with scoring goals and their hockey IQ seems just fine when they are in a position to score goals.  But their inability to care about the 99.9% of other plays that don’t directly result in a scoring chance is alarming.  So is it an IQ dilemma in other areas of the ice?  Or, is there just no more pride in stacking good plays and worrying about the process rather than the results (goals)?”

Blake Wheeler (16 seasons in the NHL, RW, Golden Gophers, coach/hockey dad) said:

“Competing to win battles, supporting teammates-knowing where and how to support the puck, and the details of doing your job (accountability).”

Steve Shirreffs (3 seasons in the AHL, Princeton All-American, Defense, Principal Granite State Capital, coach/hockey dad)

“The most basic principles of the game are protecting the front of your net, don’t turn the puck over at the blue lines, forecheck/backcheck, move the puck up the ice to teammates, follow the play/gap control, get shots on net.  When I think of someone with a high hockey IQ, I think of someone who is able to think the game to create offensive chances for himself or teammates.”

Daryl Jones (Yale Bulldog, former part-owner of the Phoenix Coyotes, Owner/Director of Research-Hedgeye, the Gold Coast’s Most Eligible Bachelor, The Real Most Interesting Man in the World, coach/hockey dad):

“When I think about hockey IQ skills, I believe they’re scanning, anticipation, risk/reward assessment, positioning with and without the puck, and awareness of the other team’s systems.” 

Matt Deschamps (AHL/ECHL, Black Bears, U. Michigan Assistant Coach, hockey dad):

“I think the basics of hockey IQ are simple, it’s seeing time and space.”

How was I to make sense of these seemingly disparate views?  The defensemen had a nuanced view from the forwards.  The coach had a very simple interpretation.  Was there any agreement?

Then I got a reply from Matt Moulson (11 seasons in the NHL, Big Red, LW, coach/hockey dad) that hit like a bag of pucks dropped from the rafters to the head—but in the best way.

“Hockey IQ starts with knowing yourself—really knowing what you’re capable of. Most so-called ‘dumb’ plays are just players overestimating their skillset and trying low-probability plays. Once you’re honest about what you can do, the game becomes a fluid puzzle. No two situations are the same, but patterns repeat. So you start solving problems in real time—based on your tools, your teammates’, your opponents’, and the context of the game. Every decision is a split-second calculation of risk vs. reward.”

That was it. That was the bridge.

The game isn’t just about smarts with the puck. It’s about being in tune—with yourself, your team, your opponent, and the game itself. That’s when I started thinking of hockey IQ in terms of layers. Overlapping rings, each one spinning at the same time.

Let me break it down.

One ring is the basic objective of the game: score more goals than the other team. Simple. Possess the puck longer. Regain it quicker. Capitalize more often. That’s the scoreboard layer.

The next ring is the game in motion—reading plays, understanding team dynamics, adapting to flow, sensing momentum shifts, knowing your assignment and anticipating where things are going next.

Then there’s context: the score, the clock, your shift length, opponent tendencies, energy level, where you are in the season, what’s happened earlier in the game. That’s real-time game management.

And unifying the three rings is the self. Honest self-awareness. Knowing what you’re great at and what you’re not. Making decisions that serve the team, not your ego. Owning your role, even if it’s not the one you want. Trusting the system. Holding yourself accountable even when the mistake wasn’t fully yours. That’s the heartbeat of hockey IQ.

Visually, we can picture hockey IQ as follows:

And here’s the kicker—these aren’t stages you walk through. These layers are simultaneous. They spin together. The highest IQ players? They don’t think about each layer in order. They line them up instantly, like dials clicking into place. And when they do? The game slows down. It clicks. It flows.

It’s not just cognition anymore—it’s rhythm.  A lot of players commented on ‘being in the present’.  There was no prefrontal cortex activation, it was feeling all of the circles at once:

This isn’t something you just drill into a kid with reps, privates and whiteboards. This is about training awareness. Pattern recognition. Self-honesty. Accountability. 

In the area I am in, players are doing countless hours of skill work.  And, I am starting to wonder if the over-emphasis on skill development at a young age is encumbering hockey IQ development.  For example, players may not need to think at the U8 and U10 level because they have a short-term skill advantage over other players (one that erodes as they matriculate through U12, U14 etc).  

Hockey IQ vs. Cognitive IQ — What Coaches Need to Understand

One of the most revealing insights that came from these conversations was this: hockey IQ isn’t distributed equally, just like cognitive IQ. Some players naturally process information faster, read plays more intuitively, and make better decisions under pressure.

But just like with academic intelligence, hockey IQ isn’t fixed.

A kid who holds onto the puck too long may not be selfish — they might simply be struggling to read the game in real time. That doesn’t mean they can’t contribute. If they’re passionate, coachable, and held accountable, they can develop awareness, improve pattern recognition, and become a smarter, more impactful player.  We hope our daily/weekly problem solving scenarios will help those players.

The takeaway? Coaches need to understand that not every player sees the ice the same way — and that’s okay. Our job isn’t just to drill skills, but to teach thinking. To build hockey intelligence just like you’d develop any other form of problem-solving.

Patience. Guidance. Accountability.

With those in place, even a player who’s not the fastest thinker can still become one of the smartest players on the ice.

A heartfelt thank you to all the hockey minds who generously shared their time, stories, and insights to help shape this framework. I might be the one putting words to it, but the real structure — the bones of this model — comes from those who’ve lived it at the highest levels.

Find. A. Way.

— Greg

Related: Mental Training for Youth Hockey Players — how focus and mental rehearsal work alongside Hockey IQ development.

See all resources: Hockey Parents Resource Guide

The post The Unifying Theory in Defining Hockey IQ first appeared on Grit Kore.

As a coach and a curious observer, I’m often standing on the edge of the rink watching players skate hard, dig for pucks, and battle—yet the effort levels vary wildly. One kid’s locked in: alert, hungry, fully alive.  Meanwhile, another teammate is floating around aimlessly, only engaging in easy plays.  

Why? Why does one kid show up ready to hunt, and another gathering low lying fruit?

I’ve had the chance to skate and skateboard alongside some of the biggest names in their sports. What sets them apart isn’t just talent or discipline. It’s passion—that hungry little beast inside that pushes them when no one’s watching.

At the Cube in NYC, I once watched Rodney Mullen repeat a 360 kickflip-to-nose-manual-to-nollie heel combo for over an hour. He was already landing it. But he just kept going. The point wasn’t the trick. It was the pursuit of his passion. (watch)

So: if passion is the difference-maker, where does it come from? And why does it run deeper in some kids than others?

Passion Brings Anxiety (And That’s Not a Bad Thing)

The deeper you care, the more you risk—and the more anxiety you’ll feel. That’s not a bug; it’s the fuel. Passion and anxiety are tied together.

Dwyane Wade’s emotional love letter to basketball (click here) says it all. He doesn’t focus on highlights—he talks about heartbreak, rejection, and staying in the game when it felt cruel. That’s passion. It’s raw. It’s vulnerable. And yes, it comes with anxiety.

In hockey terms: when a kid’s getting knocked down in a drill, getting up, and going again—that’s passion meeting failure. If there’s no desire to take on the anxiety of failure, maybe there’s no deep love yet. Or maybe… it’s not safe enough to risk failing.

To help understand this, let’s look at the upward sloping relationship between passion and anxiety.  As passion goes up, there are new levels of anxiety that a person has to accept:

The Key: Unconditional Love First

So where does deep caring come from?

To explore that, I talked with my good friend Scott Moulson (“ScoMo”), father of three elite hockey players—including an NHLer. What struck me most wasn’t his hockey knowledge—it was how he spoke about his kids. With pride. With emotion. With zero mention of stats or scholarships.  Rather, he focused on imparting the Code and pushing effort.

He loves his kids with or without the accomplishments.

That’s the key. That’s the oxygen for passion.

When a kid knows—truly knows—they are loved before the goal, before the win, before the “good game,” they’re free to go all in. To stumble. To fight. To risk everything, knowing they’re safe.

Make It Safe to Care Deeply

If your kid’s effort feels inconsistent, or if they “lack drive,” try asking:

Have I made it safe enough for them to care deeply?

A kid afraid to miss won’t shoot.

But a kid who feels safe, seen, and supported? That’s a kid who’ll take the shot—even if they miss. That’s a kid who stays after practice. Who welcomes and fights through the next level of anxiety.

Don’t get me wrong, there are hard lessons and truths that must be told.  The game is hard.  The game is honest.  And if a player isn’t staying true to the Code, there is a time and place for a harsh reality check (just ask ScoMo about that!)  

But the most important points ScoMo insisted on was his attunement and balancing when the kids needed a push or needed a friend.

Passion doesn’t start on the ice.

It starts at home.

So hug them. Embrace the Code. Celebrate the risk—not just the result.

Find. A. Way.

— Coach Greg

Quick View

Hockey IQ – Four Attributes of Hockey

$24.99

Buy Now

Quick View

The Ultimate Grit Library – Workbooks and Story Books

$59.99

Add to cart

Quick View

Grit On Ice: Part Two: Hockey IQ & Strategy

$12.99

Buy Now

Quick View

Youth Hockey Skills Workbook – Grit on Ice (Part One)

Rated 5.00 out of 5

$12.99

Buy Now

Quick View

Children’s Hockey Book | Komo’s Grit Pile Engine

$12.99

Buy Now

The post Where Passion Comes From—and Why It Matters on the Ice first appeared on Grit Kore.

Even as a coach, I’ve spent plenty of time watching my own kids’ games from the stands, trying to decode what really happened on that 2-on-1, wishing I could see the game through their eyes for just a second. That’s why the Grit Kore Konzept isn’t just another analytics gimmick, it’s a language we build, so we can name what’s happening on the ice, pinpoint what to celebrate, and chart improvement in real time. Building a connected team dynamic that develops every player to his or her highest potential.

Fully prepared for my weekly data collection, disaster struck: I was activated from the EBUR (Emergency Back-Up Referee) roster to ref games. Long story short, due to my ref duty, I only collected data for one half-ice game.

But luck showed up in the form of a prep school player who stepped up, not just to help coach, but to run point on data collection. It was a perfect trial run for something we’ve been wanting to test: how realistic is it to collect a full Grit Score dataset during a live game, and what’s the most efficient method?

Turns out, there are three viable paths to the Grit Kore Konzept data collection

• Coach as multi tasking “Stat-Junkie-in-Chief”
  This is the “me” method, you’re coaching, managing shifts, and scribbling down T’s and -P’s like a Wall Street trader during a market crash. With grit and practice, this can absolutely become second nature.

• The Volunteer Model
  A parent-coach or high school player commits to data collection for the season. They’re not juggling the bench,  just the numbers. Bonus: this role is a great way for younger players to build hockey IQ.

• Post-Game Analysis (LiveBarn style)
  Can’t get it live? No sweat. Anyone, designated parent, coach, or player, can review the game on Livebarn after the fact and score the game at their own pace.

This three-pronged model opens up the Grit Kore Konzept to nearly any team with a bench and a phone.

Even one session gives us a peek into the patterns. Below are fresh observations,  equal parts curiosity and clinical,  from that lone data set.

Observations from the Ice this weekend

Tier 1 U14 Girls Team

One Grit Score session (single data point, but interesting nonetheless)

• Score: tied 3–3

• Gross Grit Score: 97

• Lost Possession (“–P”): –39

• Net Grit Score: 56

Key take‑aways:

• Nearly no forced turnovers (“T”)
  The glaring absence in their data: they rarely wrestled possession away. In open rushes or 50–50 battles, they conceded. But in structured areas, backchecking, forechecking, shot suppression,  they did engage and grind. In other words: they may shy away from chaos, but they’re willing to fight in the trenches.

• High engagement on lower-percentage puck plays
  They battled for rebound pucks, scrappy corners, and blocking lanes. Their shot volume was noticeable, even if shot selection wasn’t always ideal. That says commitment.

• Flow vs. confrontation?
  It’s intriguing to wonder: Is their style more “soft in open ice, stiff in structure”? Or did this session just lean that way? More data will tell whether this is stylistic or situational.

Given the net score of 56, that was a tie well-earned. They may not have dominated possession, but their grit in contested zones saved them.

Half‑Ice Mites
Same opponent, familiar faces. The narrative: a sluggish start, a couple of goals down (yes, the scoreboard may be blank, but ask any kid, they feel the deficit), then a pivot: tighten the defense, force turnovers, unlock offense.

• Defensive points: 52

• Offensive points: 54

That’s nearly perfect balance. They snuffed chances low, and opened lanes up high. The shift from passive to reactive defense made their offense possible.

What the Numbers Say

• Offense and defense are symbiotic
  The Mites and the girls both landed nearly even splits. If your team can’t defend, it seldom attacks,  and if you can’t possess, offense never happens. Reality check: defense is not a consolation prize — it’s a primary pillar.

• Possession is the roof, but grit is the bricks
  Pucks don’t magically stay with you. They need to be wrested, clawed, managed. Without grit,  the turns forced, the battles won or lost — you lose connection to the game’s flow.

• Data refines intuition, it doesn’t replace it
  These numbers are “just the first draft” of what’s happening on the ice. Over time, patterns will emerge. As coaches and parents and players, we’ll get sharper at saying, “Here’s where we leak. Here’s where we surge.”
  

In Closing: The Grit Kore Konzept Vision

We’re building more than stat sheets. We’re crafting a holistic lens on the game, one where every shift, every battle, every pass, and every backcheck has voice. The Grit Kore Konzept is not about isolating pieces; it’s about harmonizing them. It’s about cultivating a team culture where every player is pushed to his or her edge, where role clarity meets raw potential, and where success is measured both in goals and in resolve.

A massive thank you to every coach who’s shared early results, trialed this language in practice, and braved the discomfort of new metrics. You’re building a rich tapestry of data, stories, and outcomes. We can’t wait for more numbers, more epiphanies, and the locker‑room moments where culture shifts, sometimes subtly, sometimes in a roar.

Keep observing, keep sharing, keep trusting the process. The numbers will follow. And when they do, we all win.

Find A Way.
Greg

The post Behind the Bench, Beyond the Stats: Building a Grit Hockey Culture first appeared on Grit Kore.

From those questions, and the early data, came the Grit Kore lifestyle concept and its practical coaching engine, the Grit Kore Konzept (GKK). The premise is simple: reward the actions that drive the game (heads-up plays, backchecks, forechecks, blocked shots, forced turnovers, assists, and goals), and hold players increasingly accountable for decision quality as they advance. Tally these actions into a single team measure, the Grit Score, and patterns emerge. Over multiple seasons, modest increases in daily effort, on the order of ten to fifteen percent, consistently moved win probabilities by meaningful margins.

The GKK is not a call for perfection, nor a license for punitive metrics, or a guaranteed win. It is a framework for clarity. By naming and tracking the behaviors that matter, we give players a language for improvement, coaches a common standard for feedback, and families a shared understanding of what progress looks like. The goal is not to produce stat sheets for their own sake; it is to cultivate environments where positive communication, accountability, and connected play become the default.

In our following posts you will find the stats, the routines and the reasoning: how to implement GKK with different age groups, how to interpret results, and how to translate numbers into teaching moments that reinforce team identity. We encourage coaches to use this material as a scaffold, adapt it to your context, keep what serves your players, and refine the rest.

The measure exists only to support the mindset, creating one spoken language between all players and coaches, rewarding effort over achievement, creating a synergy leading to growth and success. If these ideas help one athlete discover deeper resilience, one line play more connected, or one team carry its habits beyond the rink, the work has been worthwhile.

How 10–15% More Effort Tilts the Odds

Every team says they want to “work harder.” The Grit Kore Konzept (GKK) gives that cliché a number, and a scoreboard. Over four seasons of running the GKK, the same pattern keeps popping off the page: when a team increases day-to-day effort by 10–15%, the probability of winning jumps by about 50 points (percentage points). Teams that embraced it finished their seasons in their division’s championship games. Effort matters. Measurable effort matters even more.

What the GKK Measures (and Why It’s Simple)

Players earn 1 point each time they execute the habits that drive winning hockey:

• Heads-up play (make the right pass, keep the puck in the zone)

• Backcheck

• Forecheck

• Blocked shot

• Forced turnover

• Assist

• Goal

At higher levels, players can lose a point for poor decisions and lost possession. That accountability tightens the standard and rewards smart aggression.

Add up all the player points from a game and you get the Grit Score. That’s it. No complicated formulas, no black-box indexing, just a clean tally of gritty plays.

Why 10–15% Is the Sweet Spot

We analyze each season’s Grit Scores using averages, standard deviations, and cumulative distribution functions for wins and losses. Across multiple teams and seasons, the same signal shows up:

• +10% effort → ~+50 points in win probability

• –10% effort → +50–60 points in loss probability

As an assistant coach, this reframes my job. I’m a cheerleader for 10% more, using positive communication and praise to nudge one more stride on the backcheck, one more stick in a lane, one more heads-up play under pressure. Those extra reps compound into real, predictable outcomes.

Context Matters: Rink Size, Age, and Style of Play

A few field notes from applying GKK from Squirt B through Peewee AAA:

• Higher levels need higher Grit Scores. To consistently give yourself a chance at the top of the ladder, your average team Grit Score often needs to hover around 100. Space changes everything. If NHL players skated on a polo field, there’d be more time and space, fewer defensive engagements, and lower Grit Scores.

• Small-area hockey is a grit factory. Mites on small surfaces get tons of reps: more turnovers forced, more blocked shots, more forechecks, exactly the stuff GKK rewards.

A Live Example

Watching elite peewee hockey this summer, we’ve seen some players struggle with zone entries and the backcheck after failed entries. Many of them dominated full-ice at 7–8 years old on skill alone. As that advantage naturally narrows with age, the game demands an evolution: smarter entries, committed reloads, and layered support. The GKK shines a light on that transition and rewards players who adapt.

This Week’s Results

Two games, two strong Grit Scores, two convincing wins:

• Team Grit 140 → 24–4 (W)

• Team Grit 113 → 16–4 (W)

These numbers line up with what we’ve observed at the PW AAA level: when teams cross the 100-ish threshold and sustain it, performance follows. It’s more evidence that positive environments—aimed at creating 10–15% more effort—don’t just build character; they build the right habits to play the game the right way.

The post Introducing the Grit Kore Konzept first appeared on Grit Kore.